The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment
Richard Albert, Xenophon Contiades, Alkmene Fotiadou (Eds.), The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment (Hart Publishing 2017).
There is growing interest in constitutional amendment from a comparative perspective. Comparative constitutional amendment is the study of how constitutions change through formal and informal means, including alteration, revision, evolution, interpretation, replacement and revolution. The field invites scholars to draw insights about constitutional change across borders and cultures, to uncover the motivations behind constitutional change, to theorise best practices, and to identify the theoretical underpinnings of constitutional change.
This volume is designed to guide the emergence of comparative constitutional amendment as a distinct field of study in public law. Much of the recent scholarship in the field has been written by the scholars assembled in this volume. This book, like the field it hopes to shape, is not comparative alone; it is also doctrinal, historical and theoretical, and therefore offers a multiplicity of perspectives on a subject about which much remains to be written.
This book aspires to be the first to address comprehensively the new dimensions of the study of constitutional amendment, and will become a reference point for all scholars working on the subject. The volume covers all of the topics where innovative work is being done, such as the notion of the people, the trend of empirical quantitative approaches to constitutional change, unamendability, sunrise clauses, constitutional referenda, the conventional divide between constituent and constituted powers, among other important subjects. It creates a dialogue that cuts through these innovative conceptualisations and highlights scholarly disagreement and, in so doing, puts ideas to the test. The volume therefore captures the fierce ongoing debates on the relevant topics, it reveals the current trends and contested issues, and it offers a variety of arguments elaborated by prominent experts in the field. It will open the way for further dialogue.
Table of contents
Introduction: The State of the Art in Constitutional Amendment
- Amendment Power, Constituent Power, and Popular Sovereignty: Linking Unamendability and Amendment Procedures
- Constitutional Theory and Cognitive Estrangement: Beyond Revolutions, Amendments and Constitutional Moments
- Constraints on Constitutional Amendment Powers
- Comment on Doyle’s Constraints on Constitutional Amendment Powers
- Constituting the Amendment Power: A Framework for Comparative Amendment Law
- Sieyès: The Spirit of Constitutional Democracy?
Luisa Fernanda García López
- Revolutionary Reform in Venezuela: Electoral Rules and Historical Narratives in the Creation of the 1999 Constitution
- ‘Revolutionary Reform’ and the Seduction of Constitutionalism
Juliano Zaiden Benvindo
- Constitutional Sunrise
- Constitutional Change and Interest Group Politics: Ireland’s Children’s Rights Referendum
Oran Doyle and David Kenny
- Amendment-Metrics: The Good, the Bad and the Frequently Amended Constitution
Xenophon Contiades and Alkmene Fotiadou
- Comment on Amendment-Metrics: The Good, the Bad and the Frequently Amended Constitution
James E Fleming
- Constituting ‘the People’: The Paradoxical Place of the Formal Amendment Procedure in Australian Constitutionalism
Lael K Weis
- Hard Amendment Cases in Canada
- Formal Amendment Rules and Constitutional Endurance: The Strange Case of the Commonwealth Caribbean
- The French People’s Role in Amending the Constitution: A French Constitutional Analysis from a Pure Legal Perspective
- The Implication of Conflation of Normal and ‘Constitutional Politics’ on Constitutional Change in Africa
- Direct Democracy and Constitutional Change in the US: Institutional Learning from State Laboratories
Conclusion: The Emergence of Comparative Constitutional Amendment as a New Discipline: Towards a Paradigm Shift
Xenophon Contiades and Alkmene Fotiadou